Small mushroom anchors may be effective in the softest river bottom but have minimal holding power. They should be used only for personal watercrafts , small aluminum fishing boats , or dinghies. This style of anchor is a good choice for smaller boats because it folds flat and is easy to stow, and has great holding power for its weight.
Its wide, sharp flukes sink into sand and hard-mud bottoms, but are less effective in deep mud or a grassy bottom. If the wind shifts and boat drifts over the anchor and then in the opposite direction from which it was set, a Danforth anchor can pull free. A plow anchor is a little more cumbersome than a Danforth, and is a good choice if the anchor is secured on a bow roller rather than in an anchor locker in the boat.
A plow anchor has a single penetrating point and is more likely to reset itself if boat position changes. Anchors need to develop enough resistance in the seabed to withstand the environmental forces on the boat—the wind and the waves.
In all of our anchor tests, there always seems to be one undeniable conclusion: the selection of a suitable bottom for anchoring is a much more critical factor than the design of the anchor. So how do you choose the right anchor design? You must take expected bottom conditions into account. Here are some potential options, based on the seabed:. Sand: Fine-grained sand is relatively easy for anchors to penetrate and offers consistently high holding power and repeatable results.
Most anchors will hold the greatest tension in hard sand. Pivoting-fluke anchors and non-hinged scoop anchors are the best types in sand. The Rocna performed excellently in our anchor tests in sand. The Fortress , an aluminum-magnesium Danforth-style anchor, has shown incredible holding power in our still relevant anchor tests , with the 21lb.
FX37 sustaining over 5,lb. This allows the anchor to penetrate deeply to where the mud has greater sheer strength. Mud is frequently only a thin layer over some other material, so anchors that can penetrate through the mud to the underlying material will hold more. Therefore, manufacturers are free to clone an anchor design that has an expired patent but cannot use the trademarked name.
The Bruce, or Claw, remains one of the most popular anchors among recreational boaters in North America. This is our anchor of choice as well. The Bruce was developed in the 70s by the Bruce Anchor Group. Once their patent expired in the early s, they stopped production of this anchor but many imitations have come along since. The Bruce is an excellent all-purpose anchor as it performs well in most sea bottoms including mud, sand, rock, and coral.
It has a harder time penetrating harder surfaces, such as clay, and bottoms with heavy grass. The three-claw design sets more easily than other anchors. It also resets easily if it is ever broken loose. Pros: Performs well in most conditions. Sets easily. Cons: Awkward one piece design. Lower holding power per pound. Bottoms: Performs well in most bottoms; Struggles in hard bottoms such as clay, or heavy grass.
The most significant difference between these anchors is the fact that the CQR has a hinged design whereas the Delta is a one piece design. The CQR is one of the oldest styles, dating back to the 30s and to this day, it remains one of the most popular anchors among blue water cruisers.
Despite this, it has relatively low holding power and it consistently struggles in independent tests. Despite these shortcomings, the hinged design makes it more responsive to wind and tide changes as compared to other anchors. The Delta is arguably the most popular anchor on boats today, and is the standard anchor of choice used by most boat manufacturers. Both the Delta and the CQR perform well in most bottoms, struggling the most in rock.
Fits most bow rollers. Cons: Hinged design can make stowage awkward. Bottoms : Performs well in most bottoms; struggles in rock. The Danforth , or Fluke anchor, remains a very popular anchor choice. The Fortress is also a popular Fluke style anchor, different from the Danforth in that it comes apart and it constructed of light-weight, high-strength, aluminum. The Fluke performs well in mud and sand, potentially the best of any anchor style.
The downside is that outside of these bottoms, it is not a good performer. Whether or not it is used as a primary anchor, a Fluke anchor makes an excellent choice as a secondary or stern anchor. Pros: Performs well in mud and sand. Stows easily on most bow rollers. Danforth Anchor The Danforth is amongst the best of the small boat anchors and was developed by R. Danforth in It produces strong holding power, because of the thin large flukes and when under a heavy strain, the flukes bury themselves very deeply.
Best in sand or soft mud, but reduced or no holding in grass, rock, and clay. Instead of a stock through the head of the anchor, the Danforth has a round rod through the crown, that prevents the anchor from rolling.
One of its qualities, is that it can be adapted to large and small vessels. It comes from England and also has no stock. It has excellent holding characteristics and rarely fouls. It penetrates sand, mud, and weed, and hooks rocks. This anchor requires adequate scope. It will dig in immediately after a degree change in direction due to change in wind or tide directions on an anchored boat. Bruce One of the two most recent designs, it has excellent holding power in sand and rocks, but with limited holding power in soft sand and mud.
This anchor will turn degrees without breaking out and will right itself. However, it is awkward to stow in lockers because it doesn't fold. Delta The most recent design, it is similar to the CQR, but rigid. Folding Grapnel Anchor Limited holding power, used primarily for small boats and dinghies, and reef and wreck anchoring.
0コメント